CLICK HERE FOR THOUSANDS OF FREE BLOGGER TEMPLATES »

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Salsa!

In keeping with the fact that this is Super Bowl weekend, I present to you the recipe for the best salsa in the entire world. I got the recipe from a coworker (she brought it to an office party back in October and I begged her for it on Thursday), who modified her recipe from the original, and I modified it a LITTLE bit too.

  • 1 bag of frozen white corn. You can let it thaw, or not. More on that later.
  • 2 cans of black beans, drained (but not rinsed)
  • 2 cans of petite diced tomatoes. Drain these as well, but keep the juice. Tomatoes add sweetness and if your salsa gets too spicy, you can add a bit of the juice to mellow it out. But I drained them (not in the original recipe) to keep the salsa from being too watery.
  • 1/2 bunch of green onions, and 1 large shallot. (The original recipe called for an entire bunch of green onions OR a large yellow onion, but I was already using an onion in the chili I'm also making for the party, so I decided to use half the green onions and add a leftover shallot - remember the pork chops? - to add some interest. Plus, shallots are milder than onions anyway.)
  • 1 chopped red pepper (or green, they ARE cheaper)
  • Juice from 2 limes
  • Minced cilantro - about 1/2 bunch
  • 1 medium-small jalepeno pepper, minced. Make sure to take the seeds out.
  • 3-4 cloves of garlic, minced
  • 1 tablespoon olive oil
  • 1/2 tsp cumin, 1/2 tsp ground coriander, a sprinkle of cayenne pepper, salt & pepper to taste, a pinch or two of sugar, and a little Tobasco sauce
Just throw it all together. I suggest adding the cumin and coriander in the early stages (I did it when there were only tomatoes and beans in the bowl) to make sure it mixes together evenly. Important!! You COULD serve it right away (in which case, thaw the corn), but it is SO MUCH BETTER if you let it sit, stirring every 12 hours or so, for a couple days. I made it on Friday night around 7pm, and the party isn't until 5pm on Sunday. Plus this way you have some quality control.

Serve with Utz white corn tortilla chips. I have eaten a LOT of tortilla chips in my lifetime, and these are by far the best-tasting when serving with things like chili or salsa. You don't get a lot of competing flavors, and they're not too salty. They're tasty on their own, but definitely best when eaten with Mexican food.

I would also like to take this moment to talk about my newfound and undying love for Whole Foods. If you live near a Whole Foods, RUN DON'T WALK! I bought the following items for a grand total of $4.09:
  • 1 Jalepeno
  • 1 bunch of cilantro
  • 3 limes
  • 1 clove of garlic
  • Cumin (probably about 1/2 cup)
  • Coriander (also probably about 1/2 cup)
Seriously. The spices especially - the bulk-spice section... I am in awe. My friend who told me about it told me to bust out my spare pennies, and he could not have been more right. Holy cow. $4.09. As soon as I finish posting this and blow-drying my hair, I am going right back there to pick up more spices, and a Camembert that I fell in love with yesterday. And probably some Corona to use with my remaining lime.

HAPPY SUPER BOWL WEEKEND! GO STEELERS!!!

Friday, January 30, 2009

Friday Penance

New blog feature! Friday Penance: where I list a specific intention for which, quite obviously, I will be lifting up my Friday penance.

Today's penance (however insignificant they may be - I enjoy sushi too much for Meatless Fridays to be an inordinate sacrifice, however it does cut down on lunch options):

The hoped-for creation of a prelature for the Traditional Anglican Communion, who are dissenters from the ANGLICAN church and want to be welcomed into the fold of the Catholic Church once again. The rumors have re-surfaced again (I think I last caught wind of this 6 months ago?), but this time Damian Thompson is talking about it. He was one of the first bloggers last week to break the news about the lifting of the SSPX excommunications, so ... hopefully this will come about soon as well.

More about the TAC here.

Fr Z is watching, waiting, and "chilling." Or at least this could be about the TAC, or it could be about the SSPX (probably more likely given the topics of most of his posts lately), but either way...

Thursday, January 29, 2009

It won't be long now...

...before the slobbering hordes of lazy journalists remember that RATZINGER WAS A NAZI OMG.

Israel’s chief rabbinate severs Vatican ties
(Emphases and comments property of Cookie)

JERUSALEM (AP) - Israel's chief rabbinate severed ties with the Vatican on Wednesday to protest a papal decision to reinstate a bishop (as Fr Z points out, NOT REINSTATED. Nixon was pardoned, not ushered back into office.) who publicly denied 6 million Jews were killed during the Holocaust.

The Jewish state's highest religious authority sent a letter to the Holy See expressing "sorrow and pain" at the papal decision. (Right, because clearly B16 totally believes everything that that nutjob +Williamson says.) "It will be very difficult for the chief rabbinate of Israel to continue its dialogue with the Vatican as before," the letter said. Chief rabbis of both the Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews were parties to the letter.

The rabbinate, which faxed a copy of the letter to The Associated Press, also canceled a meeting with the Vatican set for March. The rabbinate and the state of Israel have separate ties with the Vatican, and Wednesday's move does not affect state relations.

Pope Benedict XVI, faced with an uproar over the bishop, said Wednesday he feels "full and indisputable solidarity" with Jews and warned against any denial of the full horror of the Nazi genocide. (Whereupon the rabbis stick their fingers in their ears and yell "LA LA LA I can't hear you over the noise of the second-rate spin artists employed by Pope Joan Chittister and her palm-frond-waving lackeys!")

The remarks were his first public comments on the issue since the controversy erupted Saturday.

The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said the Vatican hoped that in light of the pope's words, "the difficulties expressed by the Israeli Rabbinate can be subjected to further and deeper reflection." (Translation: "You're not LISTENING hard enough!")

Lombardi expressed hope that dialogue between the two parties can continue "fruitfully and serenely." (Oh right, serenely. Like last year with the "anti-Semitic" prayer fiasco. Or when B16 was elected and everyone screamed NAZI. Serenely.)

Oded Weiner, the director general of the chief rabbinate's office, welcomed the pope's remarks, calling them "a big step toward reconciliation."

With his comments, the pope reached out to Jews angered by his decision to rehabilitate bishop Richard Williamson, who told Swedish TV in an interview broadcast last week that evidence "is hugely against 6 million Jews being deliberately gassed." He said 300,000 Jews were killed at most, "but not one of them by gassing in a gas chamber."

About 6 million Jews were systematically murdered by the Nazis and their collaborators during World War II. Many were gassed in death camps while others were killed en masse in other ways, including shooting and starvation. About 240,000 Holocaust survivors live in Israel.

Jewish groups, including the American Jewish Committee, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and Israel's quasi-governmental Jewish Agency, denounced the Vatican for bringing a Holocaust denier back into the fold. (Again, not in the fold. These idiots should actually study the issue before publicly wringing their hands.)

The Vatican quickly distanced itself from Williamson's comments and said removing the excommunication by no means implied the Vatican shared his views.

Williamson and three other bishops were excommunicated 20 years ago after they were consecrated by an ultraconservative (which may be a bit of an understatement) archbishop without papal consent—a move the Vatican at the time called an act of schism.

Benedict said Wednesday he had lifted the excommunication because the bishops had "repeatedly shown their deep suffering over the situation." (By what? Continuing to consecrate and administer sacraments? Sometimes I really do wonder what kind of lip service was paid to foster this idea that they were deeply suffering. We have to trust that their intentions were good, but it seemed to me that they were perfectly happy to operate the way they have been for the last 20 years.)

The German-born Benedict expressed his "full and indisputable solidarity" with Jews.

He recalled his visits to the Auschwitz death camp—including as pope in May 2006—and the "brutal massacre of millions of Jews, innocent victims of blind racial and religious hatred."

The Vatican and the rabbinate launched formal relations in 2000 when Pope John Paul II visited Jerusalem. Since then, delegates from the Holy See and the rabbinate have met twice a year to discuss religious issues. This is the first time ties have been severed.

The Vatican and the state of Israel have had their own relationship since establishing diplomatic ties in 1993.

Oh boo-hoo.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

25 Random Things

In case I don't talk about myself enough here on this blog, I was tagged in a "25 random things" meme on facebook. I've made the post available for anyone to read, I think, so you can go HERE and take a look. And while you're there, friend me if you haven't already!

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

More canon law stuff

I'm not modest about very many things. In fact, last night, I justified a questionable decision (not morally questionable, just an are-you-sure-that-was-the-right-thing-to-do? sort of thing) with "Yes, of course it was! You know why? Because I'm faaaaaaaaaaabulous!" and did a little jazz-hands thing. Mostly it's for show, I'm not really conceited, but I still think I'm pretty great.

But I know very well that there are some things that, for me, are totally beyond any hope of comprehension, but fascinate me nonetheless. This whole SSPX thing is awesome because it's one of those things. Canon law is my JAM, but I can't make heads or tails of any law book. So that's where Fr Z and Ed Peters come in and do such a wonderful job of explaining it all.

I'm posting a portion of Ed Peters' article, with Fr Z's comments and emphases in red/bold.

SSPX Arg. 1. A person who violates a law out of necessity is not subject to a penalty (Canon 1323.4). Correct, but [but!] in asserting what amounts to an affirmative defense, the burden is on the SSPX to prove that it was objectively [not subjectively… "we really feel it is necessary" isn’t a good enough argument] necessary for them to ordain four bishops in violation of universal canon law and the specific prohibitions of the Holy See. Of course, most people who break the law think they are justified in breaking it. But it’s not the offender’s opinion of "necessity" that counts, it’s lawful authority’s determination of "necessity" that matters. And Rome is the lawful authority here, not the SSPX. [But what about "emergency powers"? Rome gets to make that judgment also.]

SSPX Arg. 2. Even if no state of necessity existed, if one inculpably [the key here] thought there was, he would not incur the penalty (Canon 1323.7). Correct, but [but!] the burden is, as above, on the SSPX to prove that they were "without fault" in thinking that it was necessary for them to ordain four bishops against universal canon law and the specific prohibitions of the Holy See. Now, if the SSPX bishops could show that, by late June of 1988, after all that had transpired to that point, they were "without fault" in still thinking it was necessary for them to violate canon law and papal prohibitions, then I don’t know who could not show themselves to be "without fault" for breaking just about any law and disregarding just about any papal directive. [True. Another point here is that some people raise the question of if, in his advanced years, the late Archbishop wasn’t perhaps less sharp than he should have been. No matter: the other bishop was involved and the four men who were consecrated were involved and made their choices.]

SSPX Arg. 3. If one culpably [the key word] thought there was [necessity], he would still incur no automatic penalties (Canon 1324.3; [other citations garbled]). Correct, but [but!] this argument avoids the crucial point that the excommunications which were lifted last week were not automatic excommunications, they were imposed excommunications (see c. 1331), that is, ones formally declared, by the Holy See no less. [The SSPXers incurred the excommunication automatically, that is true. BUT… this was confirmed by the proper authority, the Cong. for Bishops, under the direction of the Roman Pontiff.] Whatever was the canonical status of the SSPX bishops on June 30, 1988, by July 1 [when the Congregation issued the confirmation decree] they labored under declared excommunications, not automatic ones.

SSPX Arg. 4. No penalty is ever incurred without committing a subjective mortal sin [the key here is "subjective"] (Canons 1321.1, 1323.7). Incorrect. [!] Canon law does not attempt to read the souls of Catholics and does not require proof of them having committed "subjective mortal sin" before visiting penalties on offenders among them. [Remember that we look at sin in a couple ways. First, an act can be objectively sinful. Killing someone, for example, is objectively sinful because it is against the Decalogue. But there are circumstances which lessens a person’s actual guilt for that objectively sinful act. There is the state of mind, the reason, the attendent circumstances such as external pressure, duty, etc. So, there is the objective dimension and the subjective dimension of human acts.] Canon law does require that the underlying act be one that is objectively gravely sinful, [objectively] but [but!] who doubts that ordaining Catholic priests to the episcopate against the norm of canon law and the express prohibition of the pope is objectively sinful? The "culpa" mentioned in these two norms refers to legal responsibility in the external forum, [objective] not to moral responsibility in the internal forum.[objective considered in the light of the subjective] The Holy See reasonably concluded that the external, observable actions of the SSPX bishops were in violation of canon law. That’s all that was necessary.

In sum, while I think that Canon 124 suffices to put the burden on the SSPX bishops to prove the alleged invalidity of the excommunications they incurred in 1988, to the degree they think that their arguments above accomplish that goal, I disagree. I would only add that, if anyone still wants to claim that the SSPX excommunications were invalid, please read John Paul II’s m. p. Ecclesia Dei adflicta (2 July 1988), esp. para. 1-3, and show us where the pope missed the point. PS: Good luck.
See? Fascinating stuff! A friend called me a nerd on Sunday night for spending so much time reading about this stuff... and trust me, I won't deny it.

Monday, January 26, 2009

Quick thoughts on the SSPX news

I'm no canon lawyer... on weekends like this one I wish I were...

1. If the bishops acknowledge that the excommunications are now lifted, does that mean that they acknowledge that the excommunications were once there? At what point did they recognize the excommunications? Was there ever a time where they abstained from Communion because of the excommunications?

2. (When) Is Bp. Williamson going to break off and form some bizarre little group that's even more radical than the SSPX?

3. There are too many implications that can be inferred (not implied mind you) from B16's actions this weekend. As Amy Welborn points out, it's easy for us as Americans to forget that there is a world outside our borders and that SSPX things in Europe may function very differently than they do in the U.S.

The Pope is not stupid. He knows the ins and outs of the SSPX better than any of us and is deeply familiar with the various currents of belief, practice and attitude that run through it. There are virulent anti-Semites in the SSPX. There are near-sedevacantists . There are many who believe that the Second Vatican Council was an illegitimate, invalid council. There are those who believe that the Mass that most of reading this blog go to every Sunday, if not every day, is invalid and that the elements are not consecrated.

But he also knows, particularly in Europe, there are many SSPX adherents who do not share these views and are simply seeking to practice a richer Catholic faith than is available to them in their local regular parish. I think to really understand the whole picture on this, you have to understand the European situation, which in many ways is quite different than it is here.

4. How long is it going to take before the mainstream SSPX (not Williamson) meets with the Holy See to hammer out the intellectual issues? What sorts of issues will they bend to? What will they be stubborn about? I suppose that really does depend on how radical the mainstream is. I admit I am not very well-versed in these issues, not having grown up knowing about it. (My ignorance is staggering sometimes!)


As I've been saying for 18 months now (since 7.7.07, I suppose) - this is such an EXCITING time to be Catholic!

Descendit de coelis

A friend of mine recently told me that her brother has been attending a Unitarian Universalist (UU) church (for somewhat valid reasons), and he asked her to sing the “Ave Maria” at one of their December services. When she went, apparently the speaker – who was not one of the pastors, just a layman who wanted to talk – had decided to go on a rant about how Christianity, specifically Catholicism, had ruined his life and his experience of Christmas. During the “discussion” part of the service, which as she could gather was just a question-and-answer session with this speaker, she discovered that a good deal of those in attendance at the meeting used to be Catholics. A few of them felt similarly to the speaker, but many felt that, although they had left the Church, there were things about the Church that they appreciated – art, music, etc. As is typical of UU members, they felt negatively about organized religion in general but attended a UU church (I use the term loosely) because they missed that sense of “community.”

Most of you reading this blog know how I feel about the word “community,” and probably react similarly to the word. I’ll give you a moment to clean the vomit off your keyboards. You should really invest in a drop cloth for the area around your desk, by the way.

Anyway. This notion that going to church is about finding a community you can commune with is the strangest thing. I’m no stranger to the notion, obviously, being a former Protestant. I remember very clearly my high school years, when the only thing worth looking forward to on Sundays was the evening service (thank GOD I’m done with those. What a colossal waste of time…) when I was allowed to sit with my friends, giggle and pass notes, and find creative ways to flirt with whatever guy I currently had a big ridiculous crush on.

NOT exactly the best reason to go to church. But hey! That was community! My mother is still so focused on finding the right “church community” for her that I don’t think she realizes what she should really be paying attention to. When I called her last Sunday, she didn’t even know what FOCA was. And she attends an evangelical Christian service! (Well, technically it’s Presbyterian Church of America, which is the conservative branch of the Presbyterian denomination, but in the South it can be pretty close to evangelical. There’s definitely a lot of hand waving and “Amen”-shouting.)

But the idea that church is about community still doesn’t make much sense, especially in the Catholic Church. While yes, we are experiencing the sacraments together, and we’re generally pretty nice people, and a network of friends makes going to Church a little less lonely, it should be blindingly obvious that the entire point of going to Mass is the Eucharist. Maybe it’s easier for me to see because I used to be Protestant and the gaping hole is so evident when I attend my parents’ church. Maybe I expect too much from Catholics who only attend Novus Ordo services because I’ve been attending a TLM service more or less regularly for over 18 months now.

But I can’t understand this expectation that Christ, who once descended to us, will continue to lower Himself in an ordinary way, and just chill out while we sing “One Bread, One Body” accompanied by an electric piano and a rainstick. (Been there, done that, burning the t-shirt.) Yes, He descends! Our miracle is the Transubstantiation. But He is not our BUDDY. He is not a stoner who appreciates bongo drums like most modern music “ministers” do. He’s not going to sit in a circle with the rest of us and be “just one of the guys.” We were given the Mass and the Eucharist so that we could, in that brief moment, begin to ascend to Him. Our intent at Mass should be to let the grace from the miracle wash over us and begin the healing process anew for the week – not to find the cutest guy to sit next to so we can hold hands during the Our Father. (Yes of COURSE I’m guilty of this.)

It’s high time that the Church sits down and really examines its attitude toward Mass. People are leaving the post-conciliar Church in droves, only to end up at spiritual voids like the UU assemblies. I wonder WHY. Perhaps the Pope (who, as someone recently said, is fond of taking small steps with far-reaching consequences) had this in mind – or at least in his periphery – when he lifted those excommunications on Saturday. Welcoming the SSPXers into the fold (when/if it happens, some years down the road) will create such a huge change in the landscape of dioceses that have SSPX chapels that something is bound to change for the better.

As Fr Z says: brick by brick.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Proud Winner!

I'd like to thank the Academy, my ISP, Father Z, Cavey & Co... *sniff sniff* I'm so overwhelmed with emotion... TURN THAT MUSIC OFF, I'M NOT FINISHED YET!!

I, like Simplex Vir, was given my first blog award this weekend!

Lovey Award:
“These blogs are exceedingly charming. These kind bloggers aim to find and be friends. They are not interested in self-aggrandizement. Our hope is that when the ribbons of these prizes are cut, even more friendships are propagated. Please give more attention to these writers. Deliver this award to eight bloggers who must choose eight more and include this cleverly-written text into the body of their award.”

Now, I don't know if I really deserve this award. I mean, I'm pretty charming in person. However, I'll be the first to admit that I can be sarcastic and caustic in my entries.

But hey! If someone wants to award me something, I won't deny them that joy. Thanks Simplex! :)

Also, I don't want to name 8 people. I like basically everyone that I've come into contact with on my blog (and at my vacation home, the Cave). But of course, the nature of our blogs makes us all a little cantankerous sometimes. So, the Lovey Award? Maybe not. But if you're listed in the right-hand column of my blog, you deserve this award.

Friday, January 23, 2009

Spoke too soon

Note to self:
Next time you complain on your blog about being bored at work, try knocking on wood for a few minutes afterward.
Otherwise you might end up spending 4 hours (!!!!FOUR!!!!) shredding paper the next day.
God apparently thinks He's funny.

However, I did find this gem while ripping apart essay applications:

"As a work-alcoholic, my life outside education is..." blah blah blah.
That's right. Work-ALCOHOLIC. I love typos! So much so, that I saved that page, cut out identifying details, and tacked it to the outside of my cube. :)

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Guinness book of records?

Are there any documented cases of someone being medically diagnosed as having died from boredom?

Because I'm about to make history, folks.

Toasty

Lifted straight from the Crescat, because... well... now it's REALLY cold here in the Carolinas, and I don't have access to hot chocolate at the moment so this will have to do.

Her caption: "On those cold winter days... nothing cheers me up more than some Ganswein."


















I couldn't agree more.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Slaying the inaugural speech

I must explain: the sudden onslaught of snow (2 inches??? GASP!!!) has completely shut down my program this week, so I've got a bit more time than I expected. This time will inexplicably still be spent at work, even though no one is here today... seriously, I'm the only one in my wing of the building right now, and no one is calling or emailing... but whatever.

So I've found the transcript of Obama's speech today. I'm going to have fun.

My fellow citizens:

I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.

Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because We the People YES WE CAN have remained faithful to the ideals of our forbearers (can I hear an "A-men!" How about a "Bull-shit!"), and true to our founding documents. Yes, we all know he used to be a Constitutional lawyer. But I must admit, I snorted rather unceremoniously when he swore in his oath to uphold the Constitution. Mostly because he couldn't get through the oath without stumbling and stuttering everywhere...

So it has been. So it must be with this generation of Americans.

That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some (I wonder if he's heard of Clinton? Because I'm pretty sure that the husband of his Secretary of State was the one that got us into this mess...), but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age. Homes have been lost; jobs shed; businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly (so let's raise taxes to make it more affordable? What?); our schools fail too many (FALSE!! KIDS ARE STUPID and sometimes they DESERVE TO FAIL); and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet.

These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable but no less profound is a sapping of confidence across our land - a nagging fear that America's decline is inevitable, and that the next generation must lower its sights. Who on earth thinks that we need to lower our sights??

Today I say to you that the challenges we face are real. They are serious and they are many. See Dick. See Dick and Jane. See Dick and Jane run themselves into a tree because they're too busy listening to this drivel.

They will not be met easily or in a short span of time. But know this, America - they will be met. On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord.

On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.

We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture (great, now he's trying to bring God into it), the time has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness. NOTE: All deserve the PURSUIT of happiness. WE DO NOT DESERVE HAPPINESS. And also, that wasn't a GOD-given promise, that's from the Declaration of Independence...

In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of short-cuts or settling for less. It has not been the path for the faint-hearted - for those who prefer leisure over work, or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Lately I'm starting to think that it sort of IS for those people. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things - some celebrated but more often men and women obscure in their labor, who have carried us up the long, rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.

For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across oceans in search of a new life.

For us, they toiled in sweatshops and settled the West; endured the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth.

For us, they fought and died, in places like Concord and Gettysburg; Normandy and Khe Sahn. And now I'm being a big old pussy and pulling them out of where they still need to be, because my bosses... oops, FRIENDS... told me to. Time and again these men and women struggled and sacrificed and worked till their hands were raw so that we might live a better life. They saw America as bigger than the sum of our individual ambitions; greater than all the differences of birth or wealth or faction.

This is the journey we continue today. We remain the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Um, kinda. Our workers are no less productive than when this crisis began. Our minds are no less inventive, our goods and services no less needed than they were last week or last month or last year. Except that it's so much CHEAPER to transfer calls to India... Our capacity remains undiminished. But our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions - that time has surely passed. Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America.

For everywhere we look, there is work to be done. The state of the economy calls for action, bold and swift, and we will act - not only to create new jobs (great, useless employment...), but to lay a new foundation for growth. We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. We will restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology's wonders to raise health care's quality and lower its cost. We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. And we will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. All this we can do. And all this we will do.

Now, there are some who question the scale of our ambitions - who suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans. Their memories are short. For they have forgotten what this country has already done; what free men and women can achieve when imagination is joined to common purpose, and necessity to courage.

What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them - that the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply. The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works (that is totally terrifying) - whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified. Where the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. Where the answer is no, programs will end. I can't wait to see THAT. Programs ENDING under a Democratic president? Excuse me, programs that AREN'T the military. And those of us who manage the public's dollars will be held to account - to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day - because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.

Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for good or ill. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched, but this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control - and that a nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous. The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our Gross Domestic Product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on our ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart - not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good. So now let's force endless regulations on companies that actually make them even LESS productive and effective! Way to expand businesses and provide jobs that DON'T require a J.D.

As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our Founding Fathers, faced with perils we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake. And so to all other peoples and governments who are watching today, from the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born: know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman, and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and that we are ready to lead once more.

Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with (but also WITH) missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

We are the keepers of this legacy. Guided by these principles once more, we can meet those new threats that demand even greater effort - even greater cooperation and understanding between nations. We will begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people (We're already doing that. Why he doesn't understand that just baffles me. These things take TIME.), and forge a hard-earned peace in Afghanistan. With old friends and former foes, we will work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat, and roll back the specter of a warming planet. We will not apologize for our way of life (that's all he's been DOING for the last year! "Citizen of the WORLD" ring a bell?), nor will we waver in its defense, and for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.

For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, [please note that, in delivery, there was a LONG pause between the first half of this sentence and what's to follow... wonder why...] Jews and Hindus - and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.

To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect. Right, because there's LOTS of that. And we have so much in common too! And they TOTALLY want that "new way forward," all that "kill all infidels" stuff is just joking around. Riiiiiight.

To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society's ills on the West - know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy. But judging means nothing if you're going to crush any dissenters... To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history; but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.

To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish starved bodies and feed hungry minds. With whose money, again? Oh right, MINE. And I don't get any say in it. Government-mandated charity. AWESOME. And to those nations like ours that enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford indifference to suffering outside our borders; nor can we consume the world's resources without regard to effect. For the world has changed, and we must change with it.

As we consider the road that unfolds before us, we remember with humble gratitude those brave Americans who, at this very hour, patrol far-off deserts and distant mountains. They have something to tell us today, just as the fallen heroes who lie in Arlington whisper through the ages. I think we can all ask Caveman exactly what he would like to tell us... but I don't think Mr Obama wants to hear THOSE choice words...

We honor them not only because they are guardians of our liberty, but because they embody the spirit of service; a willingness to find meaning in something greater than themselves. And yet, at this moment - a moment that will define a generation - it is precisely this spirit that must inhabit us all.

For as much as government can do and must do, it is ultimately the faith and determination of the American people upon which this nation relies. It is the kindness to take in a stranger when the levees break, the selflessness of workers who would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job which sees us through our darkest hours. That sounds great, but I think we have to be honest about who we are. I know I'M not going to lose my precious hours at work, which I desperately need to survive on, just because I feel bad for someone else in the office. Yes, it's sad, but I'm currently on my second month of a pair of contacts that's supposed to last 3 weeks, because I can't afford to get my eyes checked and buy contacts on my meager salary. It is the firefighter's courage to storm a stairway filled with smoke, but also a parent's willingness to nurture a child, that finally decides our fate.

Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them may be new. But those values upon which our success depends - hard work and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism - these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these truths. What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility - a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation, and the world (us first, though, Mr Obama. You are the president of the UNITED STATES, not the U.S. and the rest of the world), duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task.

This is the price and the promise of citizenship.

This is the source of our confidence - the knowledge that God calls on us to shape an uncertain destiny. But he calls us to conform ourselves to His will - not to some lofty ideals of patriotism and courage. Our destiny is ultimately in HIS hands and we ought not take that away from him.

This is the meaning of our liberty and our creed - why men and women and children of every race and every faith can join in celebration across this magnificent mall, and why a man whose father less than sixty years ago might not have been served at a local restaurant can now stand before you to take a most sacred oath.

So let us mark this day with remembrance, of who we are and how far we have traveled. In the year of America's birth, in the coldest of months, a small band of patriots huddled by dying campfires on the shores of an icy river. The capital was abandoned. The enemy was advancing. The snow was stained with blood. At a moment when the outcome of our revolution was most in doubt, the father of our nation ordered these words be read to the people:

"Let it be told to the future world...that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive...that the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet [it]." Yeah, but virtue is dying, and hope is utterly useless if virtue is dead.

America. In the face of our common dangers, in this winter of our hardship, let us remember these timeless words. With hope and virtue, let us brave once more the icy currents, and endure what storms may come. Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back nor did we falter; and with eyes fixed on the horizon and God's grace upon us (not for loooooooooong... we have Sodom and Gomorrah fixed in our gaze), we carried forth that great gift of freedom and delivered it safely to future generations.

Blaaahhhh. Lots of bullshit, delivered eloquently.
If something similar hasn't been posted to the Cave, I'll be putting this there as well.

Again:

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Up next: Crazy Week!

Yep, another program, another blog hiatus. I'm thinking until Friday... mostly because I'm currently recuperating from the weekend (I fell asleep at 6:00PM yesterday!!), and the week itself will need some recovering from.

Also, nothing's really been happening around here. Life is pretty mundane... And nothing (besides the build-up to the FOCA vote on Thursday) has been buzzing around the blogosphere, so I kinda feel like I'm fishing for topics sometimes. Take Friday's entry, for example. Bit of a filler, and I apologize. So I'm sure I'll have plenty to whine about next weekend ;)

Homework for the week: I hope you all have found time to write to your senators and representative about FOCA. The Bishop here had a postcard campaign running today... Being as they enter discussion about FOCA on Wednesday and vote on Thursday, it might be "too little, too late"... but maybe not. Maybe it'll make a difference. Pray that it does. Also, read Fr Corapi's statement on the issue. He encourages us to pray the Rosary every day between now and the final vote. Not a bad idea...

Friday, January 16, 2009

Panicked?

What a day it's been. I was supposed to leave work at 3:30, because I had a little overtime saved up and I have a lot to do tonight before I go hang out with someone... but noooooooooo. Of course the time totally snuck up on me, even with only a 45-minute lunch break, and now I have 8 billion copies of handouts to collate before my program starts on Tuesday. And I can't come in on Monday because of the stupid holiday. I hate presenters and their secretaries who cannot get their presentations in to me when they say they will.

However, I've been oddly relaxed all day, and in a great mood. Must have something to do with the sunshine. It sure doesn't LOOK like it's only 25 degrees outside. (That's right. The high today was 27. I am not ok with this, especially because here, it doesn't SNOW when it's inhumanly cold, and that's just unacceptable.)

But all kinds of good music today too, which tremendously helps my mood. And a great weekend planned.

And I'm really looking forward to Holy Week, too. Which is odd, being as it's... oh... 2 months away? Go figure.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Hocus Pocus

Maybe I read Harry Potter too much, but today is one of those days where I really wish I could shrink all these boxes in my cubicle down to the size of Altoids. It's starting to get a little claustrophobic in here. Also, that would make the moving-it-all-downstairs job I have to do tomorrow SO much easier.

But YAYYY, another program is almost upon me! It' s been excruciatingly boring around here since I got back from Christmas, and I feel like someday I'm going to get caught blogging or playing my 18,000th round of Solitaire... and how do I justify the fact that I'm bored to tears? I need to be in the office, but I have nothing to do unless an email comes in or my phone rings. And there was a kerfluffle concerning facebook usage earlier this week (apparently there's a spy in the building), so I'm toning it down for a while. I only use it when there's nothing else going on... but I don't know if "They" would see it that way.

So I'm just sitting here, trying not to fall asleep. At least everyone else in the building is about as bored as I am - so I can wander around and find someone to hang out with :)

Monday, January 12, 2009

It's sad that they're just now realizing this...

From CNA: Birth control pill inventor laments demographic 'catastrophe'

VIENNA - The chemist who made a key discovery leading to the invention of the birth control pill has written a commentary calling demographic decline in Europe a “horror scenario” and a “catastrophe” brought on in part by the pill’s invention.

Mr. Carl Djerassi, now 85 years old, was one of three researchers whose formulation of the synthetic progestagen Norethisterone marked a key step in the creation of the first oral contraceptive pill, the Guardian reports.

In a personal commentary in the Austrian newspaper Der Standard, Djerassi said his invention is partly to blame for demographic imbalance in Europe. On the continent, he argued, there is now “no connection at all between sexuality and reproduction.”

“This divide in Catholic Austria, a country which has on average 1.4 children per family, is now complete,” he wrote.

Djerassi described families who had decided against reproduction as “wanting to enjoy their schnitzels while leaving the rest of the world to get on with it.” (Funny and not-funny-at-all at the same time...)

The fall in the birth rate, he claimed, was an “epidemic” far worse but less highlighted than obesity. In his view, young Austrians who fail to procreate are committing national suicide.

If it is not possible to reverse the demographic decline, an “intelligent immigration policy” will be necessary, Djerassi said.

According to the Guardian, Archbishop of Vienna Cardinal Christoph Schonborn told Austrian TV that Pope Paul VI had predicted the pill would cause a dramatic fall in the birth rate.

“Somebody above suspicion like Carl Djerassi ... is saying that each family has to produce three children to maintain population levels, but we’re far away from that,” the cardinal said.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Another recipe

Last night I made pork chops in a creamy champagne sauce, and garlic mashed potatoes. It was DELICIOUS. So here you are (recipe found here):

POTATOES:
4 medium red potatoes, unpeeled and quartered (I used 8-10... the "portions" that recipes assign are so bogus, and I'm a mashed-potato-aholic)
4 peeled garlic cloves (I used 7-8)
1/2 cup sour cream (I just grabbed the smallest container at the grocery store, which was probably a little more than a cup, and added a half a stick of butter as well)
2 tablespoons freshly chopped parsley leaves (whatever, dried is just fine, and the flavor is actually a little more intense)

Place potatoes and garlic in a medium saucepan and pour over enough water to cover. Add salt! Set pan over high heat and bring to a boil. Cook 8 minutes (ish), until potatoes are fork-tender. Drain and return potatoes and garlic to pan. Add sour cream and butter and mash until almost smooth (or lumpy if desired). Stir in parsley and season, to taste, with salt and black pepper (optional).
PORK CHOPS:
Salt and freshly ground black pepper (VERY important when dealing with blander meat)
1 tablespoon olive oil (I always use more)
Pork loin chops
1/4 cup chopped shallots (which is about 1 medium shallot... but I didn't think there were enough shallots, so I'll make it 1/2 cup next time)
2 teaspoons dried thyme (waaaaaay too much thyme. Use 1 teaspoon, and maybe another teaspoon of parsley instead)
1 teaspoon dried tarragon
1 cup sparkling wine or dry Champagne (I used a little more, maybe 1-1/4 cup)
1 tablespoon all-purpose flour (or more, depending on how thick you like your gravy. I used about 1-1/2 tbsp in the end)
1 cup milk

Heat oil in a large skillet over medium-high heat. Season pork with salt and black pepper and add to hot pan. Cook 2 minutes per side, until golden brown. Remove pork from pan and set aside. Now add 1 tbsp butter - it makes it creamier and easier to sautee the next ingredients. To the same pan, add shallots and cook 2 minutes, until soft. Add thyme and tarragon and cook 1 minute, until fragrant. Add sparkling wine and cook 1 minute. Whisk flour into milk (in a separate container) and add to pan. Return pork to pan and simmer 3 to 5 minutes, until pork is cooked through and sauce thickens. Serve 4 pork chops with all of the sauce and mashed potatoes.

This is what they say the dish should look like:
The sauce in actuality is a LOT darker - add more milk if you like it lighter - it kinda looks gross but tastes AWESOME (but it would taste better if there were less thyme...)

And the best part of this recipe is that, once you've added the champagne, you can drink the rest of the bottle! Which is what I did. ;)

Friday, January 9, 2009

This is totally random, again...

...But it's been under my skin and I want to talk about it.

So, I have this thing: whenever I am at home having a drink, and it starts REALLY storming, I like to take my drink outside, light up a cigar, and watch the storm. This is pretty much the only time I smoke cigars (unless there's a big celebration) - it ends up being about 2 to 4 times a year. So I enjoy it a lot.

On Wednesday, I had a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day at work, so I got home and broke the seal on the bottle of JD that I had been saving for a rainy day. Lo and behold, it DID become a rainy day. In fact, it hailed. (For like 15 minutes but hey.) So, cigars it was.

The next morning, I woke up, predictably, with the taste of cigar in my mouth. So I brushed my teeth again, but it was still there.

Time for an aside:

I have a very twitchy gag reflex. I discovered this fact when I was about 9, I suppose, and living in Georgia. My mother became obsessed with shoving carbs down my and Lil Bro's throats. Not really sure why - Lil Bro was way skinny and doctors told HIM to gain weight, but my mother was constantly telling me to lose weight. (Those of you who know me think this is ridiculous. You are right. She is insane.) But she hates cooking. She wasn't going to wake up every morning and actually cook eggs and bacon - that was a treat for when she was out of town and my dad would cook.

So EVERY. SINGLE. MORNING. for 4 years, I ate either waffles or pancakes (she alternated - Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays were waffle days). And not good waffles and pancakes. The frozen kind. Doughy and disgusting. So when she literally forced the last bites into my mouth (yes I'm serious, she was holding the fork), I discovered what a gag reflex was. Maybe that's how I developed such a twitchy one.

It's still horrible. I almost puked on the nurse who was swabbing my throat this summer when I found out I had mono. She was legitimately scared too. Dentists are not my friends, and I cannot possibly reach a toothbrush far enough into my mouth to wipe all of the cigar taste out of my mouth.

Back to the story:
So I spent the better part of yesterday trying to figure out how to get the cigar taste out of my mouth. It's not that I don't like the taste... I liked it when I was smoking the cigar, and even for a little while afterward... just not the next morning when I'm trying to talk to people without being self-conscious.

I polled my friends on facebook - I probably did 2 hours of actual work yesterday, but it's not my fault - and other than the requisite peanut gallery responses, I couldn't get a feasible answer out of anyone.

Eventually it faded. I used to work at a Buffalo Wild Wings, and we always gave people dairy products to get rid of the hot burning feeling from the wings... so I had tomato bisque and cheezits for lunch, and I think that's what helped a lot. Interesting things, dairy products.

But does anyone have any helpful tips other than dairy? (I'm slightly allergic, again due to my mother pouring milk down my throat for 18 years and my subsequent refusal to touch the stuff ever again.)

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Snippets from Italy

Our pope is such a cool guy.

Here are some memorable quotes from the speech he gave to the young people of Genoa, Italy, back in May (emphases mine):

  • Dear Young People, Unfortunately I am being pursued by the rain in these days but let us take it as a sign of blessing, of fertility for the land, as well as a symbol of the Holy Spirit who comes and renews the earth, even the arid terrain of our souls. (Ha! Such a sense of humor)

  • Yet how can one love, how can one enter into friendship with someone unknown? Knowledge is an incentive to love and love stimulates knowledge. This is how it is with Christ too. To find love with Christ, to truly find him as the companion of our lives, we must first of all be acquainted with him.

  • Thus, it is also important for us not to reduce ourselves merely to the superficiality of the many who have heard something about [Jesus] - that he was an important figure, etc. - but to enter into a personal relationship to know him truly.

  • We can overcome indifference. Because even if it seems invincible - in fact, indifference sometimes appears not to need a God - in fact, everyone knows that something is missing in his life. Only after discovering Jesus do we realize "this is what I was waiting for".

  • The further people drift from God, their Source, the more they lose themselves, the more difficult human coexistence becomes and the more society crumbles.

  • Stay united to one another, help one another to live and to increase in faith and in Christian life to be daring witnesses of the Lord. Be united but not closed. Be humble but not fearful. Be simple but non ingenuous. Be thoughtful but not complicated. Enter into dialogue with all, but be yourselves.

  • Remain in communion with your Pastors: they are ministers of the Gospel, of the Divine Eucharist, of God's forgiveness. They are fathers and friends for you, your companions on the way. You need them and they - we all - need you.
And a couple bits from the speech he gave to the young people of Sardinia in September:
  • Possession of material goods and applause of the masses have replaced the work on oneself that serves to temper the spirit and form an authentic personality. One risks being superficial, taking dangerous short-cuts in the search for success, thus consigning life to experiences that give immediate satisfaction, but are in themselves precarious and misleading. The tendency toward individualism is growing, and when one is concentrated only on oneself, one inevitably becomes fragile; the capacity to listen is weakened, which is an indispensable stage in understanding others and working together.

  • In the past traditional society helped to form and safeguard the family more. Today it is no longer so, or rather it is "on paper", but in actuality a different mentality dominates. Other forms of living together are permitted. Sometimes the term "family" is used for unions that, in reality, are not a family. Above all, in our context, the capacity for couples to defend the unity of the family nucleus is very reduced and at the cost of great sacrifice. Dear youth, recover the value of the family. Love it, not only as a tradition, but as a mature and conscious choice. Love the family in which you were born and prepare yourselves to love also those that with God's help you yourselves will make.

  • [S]erious intellectual and moral formation [is] indispensable in planning and building your future and that of society. The person who offers you a "discount" on this is not concerned for your good.

  • The Lord Jesus said: "the truth will set you free" (Jn 8: 32). Modern nihilism instead preaches the opposite, that it is instead freedom which will make you true.

  • When the sense of the presence of God is lost, everything is "tasteless" and reduces to a single dimension.

  • With the disappearance of the mystery of God the mystery of all that exists disappears too; things and people interest me in so much as they satisfy my needs, not for what they are.

  • Dear friends, like the young St Augustine, with all his problems on his difficult path, each one of you, every creature, hears the symbolic call from above; every beautiful creature is attracted back to the beauty of the Creator, who is effectively concentrated in the Face of Jesus Christ. When the soul experiences this, it exclaims, "Late have I loved you, o beauty ever ancient ever new, late have I loved you!" (Conf. X, 27.38). May each one of you rediscover God as the sense and foundation of every creature, light of truth, flame of charity, bond of unity.

  • You will not be afraid any longer to lose your freedom, because you will live it fully by giving it away in love. You will no longer be attached to material goods, because you will feel within you the joy of sharing them. You will cease to be sad with the sadness of the world, but you will feel sorrow at evil and rejoice at goodness, especially for mercy and forgiveness. And if this happens, if you will have truly discovered God in the Face of Christ, you will no longer think of the Church as an institution external to you, but as your spiritual family, as we are living now, at this moment. This is the faith that your forefathers have handed down to you. This is the faith you are called to live today, in very different times.

Another thing

What's wrong with this picture?









Now, I'm no meteorologist, but I'm pretty sure that if it's 37 degrees now, at 6:45am, and it's supposed to snow today, we're all in big trouble. I'm also not sure how it's supposed to get up to 54 today when snow is in the forecast, because that definitely doesn't happen in Michigan, but hey.

Maybe it'll snow tonight? My roommate and I are exchanging Christmas gifts tonight, so I kinda hope so. The real thing would definitely be nicer than the snowflake stickers I put on our windows...

Pray for Fr Neuhaus

This post lifted directly from Fr Z's post last night.

Please pray for Fr. Richard John Neuhaus, who is close to death.

Fr. Neuhaus, a priest of the Archdiocese of New York, is a convert from Lutheranism, an author of great insight and edition of First Things.

Father has developed an infection while battling cancer. He received last rites from Fr. George Ruttler.

In your kindness pray for him. The Enemy attacks priests.


I love this guy. A lot of you may remember his snarky comments on the ridiculousness that went on during the Masses during the Pope's visit to the U.S., particularly in D.C.


EDIT:

Fr. Richard John Neuhaus slipped away today, January 8, shortly before 10 o’clock, at the age of seventy-two. He never recovered from the weakness that sent him to the hospital the day after Christmas, caused by a series of side effects from the cancer he was suffering. He lost consciousness Tuesday evening after a collapse in his heart rate, and the next day, in the company of friends, he died.

My tears are not for him—for he knew, all his life, that his Redeemer lives, and he has now been gathered by the Lord in whom he trusted.

I weep, rather for all the rest of us. As a priest, as a writer, as a public leader in so many struggles, and as a friend, no one can take his place. The fabric of life has been torn by his death, and it will not be repaired, for those of us who knew him, until that time when everything is mended and all our tears are wiped away.

Funeral arrangements are still being planned; information about the funeral will be made public shortly. Please accept our thanks for all your prayers and good wishes.

In Deepest Sorrow,

Joseph Bottum
Editor
First Things

That fabric of life will not be mended for the lucky ones who knew him personally, nor for those of us who did not. I know I will miss him even though I only knew of him for a few short years.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Bleh

Auuuuuuugh. Shite day at work today, so I'm taking a day off from substantial posting. Hopefully something interesting will happen tomorrow.

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

"I'M A %#%gG&&$#!@2# ROCK STAR."

This has nothing at all to do with anything, but I can't stop laughing, so here you are... stolen from Go Fug Yourself:

"Dude, what's the big deal? I'm just being Courtney. And sometimes Courtney likes to wander around downtown Culver City looking like a downtrodden, underemployed, potentially violent and unpredictable Fraggle. So what? I'M A %#%gG&&$#!@2# ROCK STAR. If I can't pop out of my Escalade carrying a twelve thousand dollar crocodile handbag and wearing a feather I fished out of that lake thing in MacArthur Park, WHO CAN? So my shoes appear to be made out of trash. DO YOU HAVE THE BALLS TO WEAR TRASH SHOES? I didn't think so. Besides, I'd like to remind you that I am the woman who allowed a homeless man to suckle her bare teat at a Wendy's for photographers. This is F#$#%w$#$%(^# NOTHING. So, unwad your panties and send your angry letters to the Official Save Francis Bean Council For Rock Star Offspring, care of Kelly Osbourne, 1221 Delelicte Avenue, suite F U."

We three kings of Orient are...

Happy Feast of the Epiphany!

How are you celebrating?

The Roommate and I will (hopefully) be grabbing dinner (sushi, of course, because nothing says 3 Wisemen like raw fish), and exchanging gifts before tearing down the Christmas tree. *Sniff* It was such a beautiful tree... and it hasn't turned brown yet, like last year, when I got home from Michigan and half the ornaments were on the floor.
Of course, that's probably because we waited until Advent to decorate (Dec. 5 to be exact) instead of getting the tree the DAY after Thanksgiving like last year.

Of course, last year... ha. We had to tear down the tree early, clearly, so there had to be some other way to celebrate the Epiphany. OH RIGHT. Multiple "Three Wisemen" shots (Jim, Jack, and Johnny) with lots of friends at our favorite bar. That was SUCH a good idea.
(Of course, not as good an idea as St Patricks Day... but that's a legendary story for later.)

Monday, January 5, 2009

Munchies

Oh, yeah, great. 15 minutes to go before I have to leave work and go grocery shopping, and NOWWWWW I get hungry. Not at noon, when most people get hungry, nooooo. I even brought my lunch today. Good thing it's just soup, I can leave it here.

Which reminds me:

This. Stuff. Is. Awesome.





I suppose that's what I get for not eating until 2:45 yesterday either, but I couldn't! I was at Mass!

The first party I haven't been excited about in a long time

I'm totally screwed.

So, the first day of my program starts on the 20th. Guess what else is happening on the 20th?
....
....
....
Yes, that's right, the acension of the Obamessiah. So my bosses' boss (Big Kahuna, second in command only to Biggest Kahuna) had a coworker drop off a bag FULL of patriotic table shams, little flags, a hat. Basically it looks like the 4th of July in my office right now. And I am expected to use these as my decorations for the week. We're essentially having an Obama party and it MAKES ME WANT TO VOMIT.

Not to mention that it's entirely inappropriate for such partisan woo-hoo in a professional setting. No, never mind that. I was perfectly content to just have a red or blue table cloth, maybe some classy decorations that have nothing to do at all with the festivities in D.C. (I was sort of leaning toward a "New Year" theme, if I could find that sort of crap at the grocery store... or even a snow theme, which I know I could do.)

Blech. The only way I would WILLINGLY throw an Obama party is if he came to my office, tore up the latest draft of FOCA, and told me I was getting a $20,000 raise and my job was guaranteed until next May.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Time to get serious

Lately I have been reminded of how little I know and how much I've probably forgotten about my Faith. Coming in as a convert, I already knew a lot more about the Church than a lot of people my age who had grown up as Catholics, simply because I HAD to learn in order to make an informed decision about conversion. However, when I entered college I lost the ability to read-for-fun - there was too much else to keep up with, and theology especially tended to fall by the wayside. It's difficult stuff!

But recently I've been thinking about where I want my life to go. A few months ago I was CERTAIN that I didn't want to do Public Relations work for the rest of my career, I wanted to be a Director of Religious Ed. Building curriculum, supervising CCD, the works - basically making sure that all the kids knew about their Faith. Since I've gotten this job as an event coordinator, though, I've loved this line of work in a way I didn't think I could, and now I'm re-evaluating whether I want to get my Masters and do all that extra work. (I really, really loathe school.)

In that process of re-evaluation, and also just in meeting more and more people who love the Church, I've realized how little I know and how lazy I've been in rectifying that fact. I never had a chance with Latin - that wasn't an option in the schools I attended - saints are completely lost on me (and I still have reservations in my heart about saints and intercessory prayer, even though in my mind I know it makes sense on some level). I've got the basic Catholic apologetics down, but even that's starting to get rusty. Sure, now I can defend my position on the TLM - but what good does that do me outside of my Catholic circle of friends? Not much.

So I need to start back with it. The "Catholic" space on my bookcase - about half a shelf if you don't count the allegorically religious, not-specifically-Catholic books like the Magic Bicycle series - is pathetically small in comparison to the books I read as a child and still love, and biographies, and Harry Potter (US and UK versions... yes I'm still a bit obsessed). In fact, now that I think about it, I probably know more Harry Potter trivia than I know Catholic trivia. Well... maybe. But that's still sad. And I DEFINITELY know more celebrity gossip and trivia than I know trivia about the saints that helped shape my Faith. Not good at all.

Maybe this can be the year I get back into it all. I may need a motivator/encourager. (Dare I say accountability partner? NAY!) Anyone feel like volunteering? Book titles, advice, anything. I just have no idea how to jump back in - and I'm not sure I'm ready for the heavy theology yet. Philosophy scares me a little...

Friday, January 2, 2009

"Art"

Joe of St Therese and I have been commenting back and forth today, pondering whether or not a photo or statue of Martin Luther could appear in a Catholic parish and whether the parishioners would notice or care.

This brought to mind the lovely "art" at a parish that I attended for some time. I thought I would share the eyesores with everyone, start the new year off right, you know.

THE CLAW:

Also known as "The Mother of the Dispossessed," this lovely piece of art is surrounded by little marble plaques bearing the kinds of people who (according to the website) "are Mary’s special wards."

Included in this esteemed list, of course, is the plaque that reads "LGBTIQ."

I'm not even kidding.



Elements of The Claw (as a few of us affectionately call it) are seen elsewhere in the parish. Namely, the altar, the holy water font, and this odd structure that holds candles and the "parish book of intentions."

A few years ago, the fire station that I lived behind at the time started featuring local artists' works in the front "yard" area. One day, I was walking home and saw a smaller version of basically the same piece. We dubbed it "The Mini Claw"... because hey, if it's good enough for one of the most liberal, immoral towns in the state, it's good enough for ____________ Parish!

Wait, who's Mary?

You know, it really aggravates me that the feast of Mary, Mother of God falls on January 1.

I'm not sure if there's any reason why that date in particular was selected (this may be one of those chicken-or-egg questions), but if I have to get up early after a New Years Eve party, I had better know what feast day it is. I actually didn't know, I knew it was a Marian feast but couldn't remember which one it was - I just knew that the parish I would be attending started at 11:15. I couldn't make it out to MY parish because I had to meet my parents in Charlotte at 3 and it was going to be tight as it was.

So I slip in, and look at the hymns we would be singing. ONE Marian hymn, and the rest were Christmas songs. Excuse me if this sounds a little insensitive or stereotypical or whatever, but you'd think that bilingual Masses (where the other language is Spanish) would be a BIT more Mary-focused. Those Spanish people REALLY love Mary. But I digress.

The homily had NOTHING to do with Mary. It was one of those stupid, typical, "happy new year! let's change things for the better!" homilies with a sprinkling of Mary thrown in because it IS a Marian feast. But the homily was actually about the shepherds and how people mistreated them but they were the first to see the infant Jesus, so we should work for peace and justice (let the vomiting commence now) this year in honor of the shepherds.

I left Mass with NO IDEA which Marian feast I just attended. Yes, I could've done research, but there wasn't even any mention from the "announcements lady" before Mass. She told us which priest was presiding, just not which feast we were actually there for. Sigh.